Transformational Vs Transactional Leadership Essay Ideas

Transformational Vs. Transactional Leadership Essay

Introduction
Over the past twenty years, an abundant body of researches have been done to review transformational leadership and transactional leadership. Burn (1978) was the first person to introduce and conceptualize the concept of transformational leadership and transactional leadership. Bass (1985) based on Burn’s concept and deepened his notion with modifications, which stated that one of the best frameworks of leadership is transformational or transactional. Following Bass and Avolio (1994, p. 4) provided the idea of these two leaderships and generalized them into the development of global economic world. Bass and Avolio (1997) also suggested that there was no need to view transformational and transactional leadership as opposing ways or leaderships when we applied them into our management. Recently, researchers have begun to increase the interest of investigating the relationship between these two leaderships and seeking the influences and correlation with other features, like personality, performance and behaviour towards effectiveness (Hartnell & Walumbwa, 2011, p. 225; Rowld & Rohmann, 2009, p. 42; Bono & Judge, 2004, p. 901; Eeden, Cilliers & Deventer, 2008, p. 253). In this essay, I would like to distinguish transformational and transactional leadership and talk the possible integrations between them.

Critical discussions
The main distinction of transformational and transactional leadership is the way that how leaders relate with followers and the acquisition they receive from each other (Burn, 1978). Transactional leadership requires exchange of resources as the leaders explain the procedure to followers and expects them to successfully complete their work to fulfil their needs (Eeden et al., 2008, p. 255). This is the part of transaction which satisfies followers’ needs as well by giving contingent reward as well. Leaders are aiming to control and surveillance employees through sensible and thrifty intention (Bass, 1985). It simply requires an agreement between leaders and followers toward organization goal (Burns, 1978). In transformation leadership, leaders focus on changing followers’ moral sensibilities and potentially increasing their motivation beyond self-interest (Kezar & Eckel, 2008, p. 381). It needs more associated with outcome criteria than transactional leadership (Rowold & Rohmann, 2009, p. 42). Transformational leadership helps to build positive relationship among staff and raising their morale. In contrast, transactional leadership helps to build the fundamental structure of the organisation (Kezar & Eckel, 2008, p. 383).

Transformational leadership are classified into four components which are pointed out by Bass (1990, p. 28), ‘charisma, idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation and individualized consideration’. Apart from these basic roles, charisma leadership, a collection of personal characteristics, has its own role of literature since it has...

Loading: Checking Spelling

0%

Read more

Diversity in Western vs Eastern Transformational Leadership

1617 words - 6 pages B.M. Bass developed a study in 1985 on leadership in the western world which focused on western leaders and how they influenced their subordinates. What he found was that leaders across organizations shared similar attributes. He referred to this style as “transformational leadership”. Through this style, leaders “inspire followers to transcend self-interest for the good of the organization and can have an extraordinary effect on their followers”...

The Usefulness Of The Styles And Contingency Approaches In The Managerial Context

2217 words - 9 pages INTRODUCTIONThe styles and contingency approaches provide a useful understanding of leadership in the managerial context by providing framework for which a manager can operate within. Whilst the approach has its limitations and cannot illustrate the correct response in all situations it, as a set of theories, provides practical guidance, consistent with established research, for managers in every day situations by focussing on the...

The Study of Leadership and the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire

1817 words - 7 pages “The study of leadership rivals in age the emergence of civilization, which shaped its leaders as much as it was shaped by them. From its infancy, the study of history has been the study of leaders- what they did and why they did it.” (Bass,1990) “..the transformational leader articulates the vision in a clear and appealing manner, explains how to attain the vision, acts confidently and optimistically,...

Transformational leadership for change

703 words - 3 pages Transformational leadership is an important contemporary theory of leadership. Its one leadership style consistent with successful organizational change management.Burns argued that all leadership behavior is either transactional or...

Description of Clinical Leadership Theories

2073 words - 8 pages From the discussion about clinical leadership, it is clear that not every leadership is aimed at changing or disputing people’s vision of the future. This means many better ways exist in which people can lead, without disregarding the perspectives and visions of others. Clinical leaders should portray congruent leadership attributes, in which their actions, activities, and endeavors are driven and matched by their beliefs and values. Congruent...

Leadership Models and Communication

1117 words - 4 pages According to Johns and Saks (2001), "Leadership is the influence that particular individual exert on the goal achievement of others in an organizational context. In theory, any member of an organization can exert influence on another, but some members are in a better position than others" (p. 272). Furthermore, formal leadership is no guarantee that there is leadership, because some managers and supervisors fail to exert influence on others,...

The Immersion of Transformational Leadership

3730 words - 15 pages Introduction Leadership has evolved dramatically over the one hundred years. From its early stages of endowed personality characteristics, leadership has evolved to a more dynamic and fluid process that surrounds itself in a more inclusive environment. While many leadership theories compare and contrast one another, the immersion of transformational leadership has truly projected the thinking of leadership into a new form of logic and context....

Leadership

3579 words - 14 pages Full Range Leadership Model Vs. Models of Organizational Behavior: Cross comparison of military leadership models and civilian models of Organizational BehaviorXXXXXXX1MGT 6671Executive SummaryIn light of recent force management measures implemented by the Department of Defense, military personnel are being forced into an unfamiliar battleground, the civilian world. Military members have...

Leader Characteristics

1744 words - 7 pages Leader Characteristics Charismatic leadership is one of four subdivisions of the larger concept of transformational leadership (Bass, 1990). Charismatic leaders are self-confident, dominant, purposeful, articulate, influential, idealistic, and expressive. They have high energy levels, strong convictions, the ability to display empathy, and are risk takers (Bass, 1990). By stimulating "ailing corporations, revitalizing aging bureaucracies or...

Leadership and complex adaptive systems

1710 words - 7 pages Although current leadership theory emphasizes the distinction between transactional and transformational leadership, in fact, most leaders have a mixed profile of the full range of leadership styles. The best form of leadership is not only transformational or only transactional, but rather a combination of the two. However, in order to...

Comparing and Contrasting Leadership Models

2167 words - 9 pages Comparing and Contrasting Four Leadership Models and TheoriesThe following paper outlines the comparison and contrast of four leadership models and theories. The purpose of this paper is to acquaint readers with the basic concepts underlying each model and theory. A review of the scholarly studies on leadership shows that there is a wide variety of different theoretical approaches to explain the complexities of the...

Transformational & Transactional Leadership Essay

559 Words3 Pages

Introduction
Over the past twenty years, an abundant body of researches have been done to review transformational leadership and transactional leadership. Burn (1978) was the first person to introduce and conceptualize the concept of transformational leadership and transactional leadership. Bass (1985) based on Burn’s concept and deepen his notion with modifications, which stated that one of the best frameworks of leadership is transformational or transactional, but not opposing to each other. Followed by Bass and Avolio (1994), they provide the idea of these two leaderships and generalize them into the development of global economic world. Bass and Avolio (1997) also suggested that there was no need to view transformational and…show more content…

Leaders are aiming to control and surveillance employees through sensible and thrifty intention (Bass, 1985). It simply requires an agreement between leaders and followers toward organization goal (Burns, 1978). In transformation leadership, leaders focus on changing followers’ moral sensibilities and potentially increasing their motivation beyond self-interest (Kezar & Eckel, 2008, p. 381). It needs more associated with outcome criteria than transactional leadership (Rowold & Rohmann, 2009, p. 42). Transformation leadership helps to build positive relationship among staff and raising their morale. In contrast, transactional leadership helps to build the fundamental structure of the organisation (Kezar & Eckel, 2008, p. 383).

Transformational leadership are clarified into four dimensions which are pointed out by Bass (1990, p. 28), ‘charisma, idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation and individualized consideration’. Apart from these basic roles, charisma leadership has its own role of literature since it has similarity with transformational leadership and they are contribution to each other (Judge & Piccolo, 2004, p. 755). On the other hand, there are three dimensions of transactional leadership which includes contingent reward, active and passive. The difference between active and passive which are the exceptions of management is the timing of leaders’ interference. It is also the advantage

Show More

0 thoughts on “Transformational Vs Transactional Leadership Essay Ideas

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *